The three caballeros part

The three caballeros part 1

The larger ISPs are part of the media mafia and they will do everything they can to push consumers off them and back into buying media from traditional sources. And then there is shoehorning in the tiered net witch is coming becusr big brother is paid to look the other only use one part of my quote. However, people can read what I wrote so it clearly wont be misinterpreted. Im wondering why you didnt put in my part of the quote where I agreed with you that ISP are limiting bandwidth? Maybe you are just here to start trouble which is clearly the case. Actually Zippy is correctt. Bandwidth limits will effect how much HD content you can view before your cut off or have to pay extra for your DSL or Cable internet connection. Ive recently switched to a business class service just to avoid the caps. I agree blu-ray is extremely overpriced but youll pay just as much or more than blu-ray per movie if you go over your bandwidth cap. Looks to me like your the one starting trouble. You called the man a Jackass for no reason. Your obviously nothing more than a Sony hater looking to put down anybody who might have any reason why blu-ray might survive. Or your bandwidth is nackered but functional turning your HD stream into if its a auto connection type into SD video. But more to the point the ISPs need to go after speed not amount, if they go after amount theyll find their user base drying up, then again in middle sized cities where you have ATT or Cable theres not much choice. the three caballeros part 1 as it appears the latest figures are in. And of the people surveyed seemed to think that media based and supplied over the internet even with band widths is going to be the way that the general public is going to view media. my original figures are incorrect and should be disregarded because Im paid alot of money to spill useless facts that provide information that promotes the highest bidder. At this momenmt Internet is better then Blu-ray. But have no fear, Im expecting a call from scandisc saying their going to movies on jump drives. if their price is bigger then blu-ray, and the net new figures will lean towards scandisc. Oh and BTW, this is not a real news report. This is a fabrication of my stupid brain well as it appears the latest figures are in. And of the people surveyed seemed to think that media based and supplied over the internet even with band widths is going to be the way that the general public is going to view media. my original figures are incorrect and should be disregarded because Im paid alot of money to spill useless facts that provide information that promotes the highest bidder. At this momenmt Internet is better then Blu-ray. But have no fear, Im expecting a call from scandisc saying their going to movies on jump drives. if their price is bigger then blu-ray, and the net new figures will lean towards scandisc. Oh and BTW, this is not a real news report. This is a fabrication of my stupid brain But the net is only better for social pirates if you pay for all youer content its much worse, 16GB jump disc is about 30 whole sale so blu ray is great, even mroe so when discs are 50cents a pop:P We need 3 things to make the net great 1 ISPs that the three caballeros part 1 by speed not by amounts, the ability to easily subscribe to and view TV online in HD and faster net of course. Charge 10 per 1MBPS under 3MBPS, and 5 over 3MBPSfirst 3 covered, 3 over ten MBPSfirst ten covered this will balance things out. The cable companies are going to have to just reform their infrastructure alil bit to allow for individual speed control. I bet most of the people like having somekind of physical copy what they bought. Imho online video services are most likely only going to affect blu-ray rentals. Just to name few reasons why i would state something like this.